« Does Catch and Release Really Work? | Main | Tennessee Roundup »
May 10, 2006
McNabb Creek and the Restoration of Southern Brook Trout
Like many trout anglers, my fishing time in the southeast was primarily spent on the large and artificial tailwaters. Trout were, and still are, stocked in an attempt to fill the ecological and recreational voids created by the dams. Trout fishing in these systems can be a blast, and these fisheries are enjoyed by thousands of anglers, but as conservationists, it is important that we remember the natural trout fisheries in the area…

The McNabb Creek drainage as seen from the Cherohala Skyway
Southern Appalachian brook trout are a genetically distinct subspecies that has been decimated by nonnative trout species, anthropogenic disturbance, and other factors. Remaining populations are largely limited to the protected high country found in the national forests and Great Smoky Mountains National Park. Even in these areas, disturbance has extirpated brook trout from many watersheds. McNabb Creek in the Tellico River system was one such stream. Fortunately, government agencies and Trout Unlimited volunteers are working to restore this fishery.
The Cherohala Skyway, a National Scenic Highway on the Tennessee-North Carolina border, is aptly named. Driving this route on top of the mountains is reminiscent of flying in a helicopter. The aerial vistas are enjoyed by many, particularly motorcyclists who relish the hairpin turns more than I did as a passenger in the backseat of Jim Herrig’s SUV. Jim, a member of TU’s Appalachian chapter and a fisheries biologist for the Cherokee National Forest, is a key player behind a coalition that aims to restore McNabb Creek. In addition to Jim, I met active TU members Robert Wilson, Don and Beverly Denney, and Gary Williams during my tour. Robert is the new president of Chattanooga’s Appalachian chapter while Don and Beverly are cornerstone members of the Hiwassee chapter. Gary Williams, of the Little River chapter, is a former Tennessee Valley Authority biologist who is currently spearheading a macroinvertebrate monitoring effort in McNabb Creek. I couldn’t have stumbled upon better hosts to teach me about the restoration of this fishery.
When the construction of the Skyway began in the ‘70s, it was not realized that the road was being cut through the unique Anakeesta formation. Anakeesta is a highly acidic sedimentary rock and when construction crews ground it up and used it for fill, they unknowingly exposed more surface area to runoff, resulting in highly acidic conditions in the watershed. For decades, McNabb Creek had a pH of below 5.5, rendering it unsuitable for diverse aquatic life and brook trout. In particular, low pH causes aluminum to leach out of the soil into runoff. Aluminum is highly toxic to trout and other aquatic organisms.
The first step towards restoring the creek was to elevate the pH. A year ago, the Cherokee National Forest and the Tennessee Wildlife Resources Agency (TWRA) began depositing pH basic limestone sand at culverts along the highway (see the photos). Liming the culverts helps neutralize runoff from the Anakeesta fill, raising the pH the creek. After the liming began, aluminum started to precipitate out of the stream water, resulting in visible silver flakes on the creek bottom.
With the pH back towards neutral, Jim’s crew, TWRA, and Trout Unlimited volunteers from three chapters (Hiwassee, Appalachian, and Little River) electroshocked the creek late last summer, in an effort to remove a small population of rainbow trout that was somehow able to survive the acidic conditions. Rainbow trout out-compete brookies, so their removal is integral to the success of the restoration. Then, the team stocked about 200 native brook trout from a nearby watershed. Jim is anxiously waiting to shock the creek next month in search of fry. Everyone is hoping that the re-introduced brookies were able to spawn successfully.
See the photos HERE
To find out more about brook trout restorationand natural history, visit www.brookie.org.
For more information on the Appalachian chapter visit www.appalachiantu.org
If you are interested in the Hiwassee chaper, please check out www.hiwassee.net
Posted by ladelfio at May 10, 2006 07:32 PM
Trackback Pings
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://blog01.kintera.com/cgi-bin/spamreallysux.cgi #mt-tb.pl/2243
Comments
The dilemma of road construction has haunted the Appalachian region for decades. This mountainous region has suffered from both the lack of roads and the geological ramifications of inserting roads in formations that are highly acidic due to their age. These are old mountains, worn down and removed of buffering capabilities to buffer acidic deposition, yet isolating and holding back economic development for its inhabitants. An economic dilemma that rivals Third World nations.
Posted by: Charlie Nichols at May 12, 2006 03:02 PM
David, your comment brings up an interesting point about this story that I failed to mention in the entry. Biologists realized that the fill was killing the creek during the construction process. They weren't able to act in time to help McNabb, but neighboring Laurel Fork was saved. The construction crews started to import fill from another location once the detrimental effects of Anakeesta were documented. They also constructed some large bridges to minimize the use of fill in general. The construction process took over 30 years, largely because of these efforts, but priceless coldwater habitat in the Laurel Fork was saved.
The Cherokee National Forest and the state deserve recognition for attempting to build this road in an environmentally responsible way.
It does go to show though, that even when developers have the best intentions, things can still go wrong.
Posted by: Luca at May 11, 2006 05:31 PM
Interesting dilemna. You vividly describe a byway that offers unparalleled vistas and access to fishing that may (or may not) have been accessible in the past. And yet the making of that same road has caused environmental degradation. I am wondering if the road were proposed today, would we in fact be able to build it or would the environmental impact be too great? Or, what would we do different to be able to enjoy this resource?
Posted by: David at May 11, 2006 12:26 PM

















