« The North Fork of the White River: A World Class Tailwater Fishery | Main | McNabb Creek and the Restoration of Southern Brook Trout »
May 07, 2006
Does Catch and Release Really Work?
You've probably seen large land mammals wearing radio telemetry collars. Did you know the same technology is used to track fish? Aaron Cushing is one biologist using this tool to answer important questions about fisheries management...

UA grad student Aaron Cushing tracks his trout with assistance from TU members Dennis McCarty and Clay Henry
Do catch and release (c&r) areas really protect trout? Do trout stay in c&r areas, or do they sometimes move to nearby catch-to-keep zones? Are mortality rates higher in catch-to-keep zones?
These are some of the questions Aaron is addressing with his master's thesis. Aaron has four study reaches on the North Fork and the mainstem of the White River. At each reach, he implanted transmitters into 40 rainbow trout ranging in size from 14-17 inches. The transmitters are inserted into the ventral body cavity proximal to the anus (see the photos). Half of these fish were captured in c&r zones while the other half were collected from catch-and-keep zones. Aaron has been returning to his reaches once a week to keep tabs on the movements and mortality rates of his subjects.
Arkansas TU members Dennis McCarty and Clay Henry and I caught up with Aaron as he collected his weekly data on the North Fork. Arkansas TU is assisting Aaron’s project financially. We launched a 20' river boat near Norfork dam and went to work. While Dennis, Clay, and I focused on negotiating the rocky shoals and shallow riffles, Aaron checked his radio frequencies for nearby trout. When we honed in on a trout, we dropped anchor and marked the location with GPS, as well as measured temperature, dissolved oxygen concentration, water flow, and water depth. Aaron will use these data to calculate each trout’s range and preferred habitat conditions.
Most of the trout have stayed at the exact location where they were captured last fall. For the c&r fish, this increases the odds of survival. Aaron’s work has shown that mortality rates are higher outside of catch and release areas. Sometimes his $225 transmitters end up on the bank, sometimes they just disappear. Aaron even tracked one into a cabin owned by a nearby resort! Regardless, this is valuable information. Aaron has found that angler induced mortality is significant outside the catch and release area.
The final stage of his study will involve capturing his remaining trout one year after he tagged them to not only get his expensive transmitters back, but also to look at an otilith, or ear bone, from each fish. The presence or absence of certain rare compounds in each otilith will, among other things, give Aaron an idea of whether or not the fish came from the hatchery. The presence of wild rainbow trout has not been documented in the White River system. The fish attempt to spawn each spring, but the success of their offspring in the highly variable flows is unknown.
Hopefully this final stage of his project will be as successful as his mortality study. Already his work will provide useful and interesting information for fishery managers.
(If you haven't already, look at these photos)
Posted by ladelfio at May 7, 2006 08:55 AM
Comments
Bjorn,
Thanks for visiting the site.
The transmitters are suprisingly well tolerated by the trout. Fish have evolved to handle wounds from heron strikes, missing eyes, missing fins, etc. Aaron's tagged fish have been living with the transmitters for over 6 months without a problem. Furthermore, because he tagged fish both in and out of the catch and release zone, his study controls for the negative effects of the capture process.
That said, the trend in fish and wildlife biology is towards less intrusive means of study. For example, instead of trapping large mammals, biologists are using fecal DNA and hair samples to study populations.
We have made substantial progress since the days that biologists would lob off toes and spray paint squirrels, but we could still benefit from new technology that will further the cause of studying animals without harming them.
Posted by: Luca at May 24, 2006 10:05 AM
I'm wondering if the tagging itself might contribute to mortality. Seems like a pretty intrusive tag. I'm sure that was considered at the front end, but I'd love to hear what the thoughts were on that.
Posted by: Bjorn at May 23, 2006 04:45 PM

















