Christian Alliance for Progress
 

News & Events

Donate

 
Home > Community Forum > The Hollowness, Timidity and Hypocrisy of the Liberal Churches

« Previous Entry | Next Entry »

January 18, 2007

The Hollowness, Timidity and Hypocrisy of the Liberal Churches

by Jesus Politics

Chris Hedges' new book, "American Fascists: The Christian Right and the War On America" is certainly provocative for the Christian Right, but what impresses me even more is how it also provokes and challenges mainstream Christians.

From the excerpt available online:
Mainstream Christians can also cherry-pick the Bible to create a Jesus and God who are always loving and compassionate. Such Christians often fail to acknowledge that there are hateful passages in the Bible that give sacred authority to the rage, self-aggrandizement and intolerance of the Christian Right. Church leaders must denounce the biblical passages that champion apocalyptic violence and hateful political creeds. They must do so in the light of other biblical passages that teach a compassion and tolerance, often exemplified in the life of Christ, which stands opposed to bigotry and violence. Until this happens, until the Christian churches wade into the debate, these biblical passages will be used by bigots and despots to give sacred authority to their calls to subjugate or eradicate the enemies of God. This literature in the biblical canon keeps alive the virus of hatred, whether dormant or active, and the possibility of apocalyptic terror in the name of God. And the steady refusal by churches to challenge the canonical authority of these passages means these churches share some of the blame. "Unless the churches, Protestant and Catholic alike, come together on this, they will continue to make it legitimate to believe in the end as a time when there will be no non-Christians or infidels," theologian Richard Fenn wrote. "Silent complicity with apocalyptic rhetoric soon becomes collusion with plans for religiously inspired genocide." [ ]

If this mass movement succeeds, it will do so not simply because of its ruthlessness and mendacity, its callous manipulation of the people it lures into its arms, many of whom live on the margins of American society. It will succeed because of the moral failure of those, including Christians, who understand the intent of the radicals yet fail to confront them, those who treat this mass movement as if it were another legitimate player in an open society. The leading American institutions tasked with defending tolerance and liberty -- from the mainstream churches to the great research universities, to the Democratic Party and the media -- have failed the country. This is the awful paradox of tolerance. There arise moments when those who would destroy the tolerance that makes an open society possible should no longer be tolerated. They must be held accountable by institutions that maintain the free exchange of ideas and liberty. The radical Christian Right must be forced to include other points of view to counter their hate talk in their own broadcasts, watched by tens of millions of Americans. They must be denied the right to demonize whole segments of American society, saying they are manipulated by Satan and worthy only of conversion or eradication. They must be made to treat their opponents with respect and acknowledge the right of a fair hearing even as they exercise their own freedom to disagree with their opponents. Passivity in the face of the rise of the Christian Right threatens the democratic state. And the movement has targeted the last remaining obstacles to its systems of indoctrination, mounting a fierce campaign to defeat hate-crime legislation, fearing the courts could apply it to them as they spew hate talk over the radio, television and Internet. Despotic movements harness the power of modern communications to keep their followers locked in closed systems. If this long, steady poisoning of civil discourse within these closed information systems is not challenged, if this movement continues to teach neighbor to hate neighbor, if its followers remain convinced that cataclysmic violence offers a solution to their own ills and the ills of the world, civil society in America will collapse. [ ]

Anger, when directed against movements that would abuse the weak, preach bigotry and injustice, trample the poor, crush dissent and impose a religious tyranny, is a blessing. Read the biblical prophets in First and Second Isaiah, Jeremiah, Micah and Amos. Liberal institutions, seeing tolerance as the highest virtue, tolerate the intolerant. They swallow the hate talk that calls for the destruction of nonbelievers. Mainstream believers have often come to the comfortable conclusion that any form of announced religiosity is acceptable, that heretics do not exist.

The mainstream churches stumble along, congregations often mumbling creeds they no longer believe, trying to peddle a fuzzy, feel-good theology that can distort and ignore the darker visions in the Bible as egregiously as the Christian Right does. The Christian Right understands the ills of American society even as it exploits these ills to plunge us into tyranny. Its leaders grasp the endemic hollowness, timidity and hypocrisy of the liberal churches.


Posted by Jesus Politics at January 18, 2007 02:27 AM

Open links in secondary window

Comments

I get tired of this kind of finger pointing. It oversimplifies problems in much the same way that I believe the religious Right oversimplifies theology and bibical interpretation. Of course, this kind of simplified finger pointing is what sells fastest and easiest. Witness the success of the religious Right.

Posted by: john g at January 18, 2007 02:07 PM

Greetings,

Interesting article. There is much there that I agree with. Chris Hedge's has done an excellent job of framing the basic problem. It has always seemed to me that one of the biggest problems with Progressive Christianity is in its' response to agressive intolerance. IMO, we are perhaps a little too passive. We tend to forget that we are actually stepping into an intellectual/spiritual arena and that leads to confrontation. We are facing a gang of bullies. Bullies that won't leave us alone.
We have, I believe, reached a point where we need to get our message out. We need to show that there is another way. We need to define ourselves and what we stand for rather than let the Dobsons, the Robertsons, and the Fallwells of the world do it for us.

Posted by: Frank Frey at January 18, 2007 07:25 PM

Frank,

How do we get our message out? I look around and see lots of progressive Christians and theologians trying to get their voice heard, but no one seems to care. Tolerance and peace don't make for good sound bites, so the media tends to focus on those preaching other values. Additionally, progressive Christians and theologians have nuanced approaches to many issues, that require a bit more explaination than fits in a nice little sound clip.

We need to recognize that our message is not the religious Right's message and that in order to get it out to the world, we don't want to copy the media-saviness of the rR. In fact, our message is not well suited to the sound bite driven world of the mainstream media. If it were, then we wouldn't still be talking about getting our message out. Instead we need to focus on building our message and our movement through alternative channels.

Posted by: john g at January 19, 2007 10:47 AM

Chris Hedges had an Op-Ed piece last Sunday, January 14, 2007 [C1:Currents] in the Philadelphia Inquirer, which was a bit more poignant that was the succession of quotes above but which, nevertheless, called attention to his book. The retreat just this week from the warrantless wiretaps was hardly an agreement in kind but a court decision against this illegality. Nor can Alberto Gonzales' appearance at a Senate Committee be construed as Sen. Leahy dealing with pentup frustrations of recent vintage now that he had assumed the Chairmanship since Sen. Specter also weighed in & picked up where he had left off. The increasing confrontation over what Hedges terms the "steady Weimarization" of "grave political consequencies" committed by this administration with the usurpation of fundamentalist "believers" clinging to bizarre forms of spiritual Darwinism [C5] is indeed the problem, underpinned with literalistic biblicism. As exploited by demagogues as is the desperation of such adherents, these despairing Americans need Progressives' attention because they have been offered "nothing else" by their pseudoleaders. To call attention to their plight is hardly "finger pointing" as charged above since this is a "tipping point" in contemporary turf warfare with nothing less than the former country we all once knew potentially lost forever to fascism.

I have not needed (do not need) Hedges' permission to point out the same. I have boldly called NeoCons 'neoFascists' not as a fit of fancy but as a description of a state of affairs. To be less bold is to surrender to dastard literalism of the religious Right's agenda, which is not our Christian message at all. Bas relief shows difference for what it is, not a me-tooism. We must continue a "fight back" mode until the fundamentalist fringe is back from whence they came & their former apolitical appropriation. They do not speak for Christianity, and they certainly do NOT speak for us. This is not a battleground in which we take comfort, for proselytizing is not our way, but they must be documented for the proselytizers that they are. In my vocabulary, there are only a couple of other words equal to or worse than.

Posted by: Arden C. Hander at January 19, 2007 07:14 PM

I started to comment, but it got too long, so posted a response on my site. Enjoy.

www.twoorthree.net/2007/01/book_criticizin.html

Posted by: seeker at January 19, 2007 11:23 PM

Post a comment




Remember Me?


Verification code:


Please enter your verification code:

Join the movement
Five things you can do right now to stand up, be counted and join the movement.
Donate
Sign Up for Updates