Christian Alliance for Progress
 

News & Events

Donate

 
Home > Community Forum > International Human Rights Day

« Previous Entry | Next Entry »

December 11, 2006

International Human Rights Day

by Westmoreland-White

10 December is celebrated the world over as International Human Rights Day. This gets very little press in the U.S.--especially in the last few years when our government has argued (with support from many "Christian" leaders) that various groups of people aren't human enough to have their rights protected. Some argue that those accused of terrorism have no human rights and can be tortured at will or imprisoned without trial (even though nothing has yet been proven). Others argue that Muslims or non-citizens have no rights that must be acknowledged. (Am I the only one hearing echoes of the infamous Dred Scott case in which the 19th C. Supreme Court ruled (a) that slaves were not citizens and (b) that no black people had any rights that white people "were bound to respect?!!") Some argue that sexual minorities have no rights--and label all moves for equal treatment for GLBT persons as campaigns for "special" rights--special like not being fired for being gay, or evicted, or being denied custody of a child, or denied coverage under partner's insurance, or banned from a partner's intensive care ward because one is not recognized as "family."

On this International Human Rights Day, the U.S. just surpassed China at having a greater percentage of our population in prison than any other nation--mostly due to mandatory prison sentences for nonviolent drug abusers and mandatory sentences for "crack" cocaine (largely used by the poor and racial minorities) while giving powdered cocaine (a more elitist form of the same drug used more by wealthy whites) probation and counseling. Much (not all) of the increase in female prison populations is due to a misuse of conspiracy and racketeering laws that have allowed corporation heads involved in illegal drug sales to pin their crimes on unwitting female secretaries or wives or girlfriends. The glaring atrocities of the Guantanemo Bay gulag, secret prisons, "star chamber" military tribunals and torture need only be mentioned.

Meanwhile, elsewhere in the world, "honor" killings are carried out on women who get pregnant out of wedlock (even by rape!) or who marry unapproved men--by their own family members. Journalists are killed for telling the truth (while here journalists are becoming willing stenographers for powerful elites of business or government), novelists are imprisoned for "insults" to the national honor or to religious orthodoxy, and people are killed for changing religions. Human rights standards are trashed the world over.

The term "human rights" was coined in 1640 by Richard Overton, an English General Baptist influenced by Dutch Mennonites. Along with Congregationalist John Lilburne, Overton led the Levellers, a religiously inspired movement for political equality that sprung up during the English Civil War. His ideas would soon be supported by another Congregationalist, the blind poet John Milton, and by Quakers George Fox and William Penn, and Baptists Roger Williams, John Bunyan, Gerrard Winstanley, Dr. John Clarke, and Hanserd Knollys. Enlightenment philosophers who favored human rights like Locke, Rousseau, Jefferson, and Madison came later, building on, and in some cases WATERING DOWN, the robust views of human rights pioneered by these leftwing Protestants. Human Rights are a Christian (Free Church) heritage--and yet, today, the majority of U.S. Christians (not just Fundamentalists, but some centrists and liberals, too) ridicule this concept of basic justice for everyone as "secular thinking."

Let's reclaim our Human Rights heritage and work to protect human rights the world over--wherever they are threatened. This week, I sent in my renewal donations to Amnesty International and the National Religious Campaign Against Torture. I challenge all "progressive Christians to find concrete ways to promote and defend human rights.

Posted by Westmoreland-White at December 11, 2006 02:43 PM

Open links in secondary window

Comments

What an irony of situation that Pinochet died on IHRD. Riots & violence were sparked by his death just as was true of his life. Did his fascism & repression trump Allende's socialism?....or did the CIA pick him not for ideology but for being a more willing partner? Nixon's 'Red Scare' would have searched out another to kill Allende if Pinochet had not been so willing, but is not Dubya carrying out similar scares in Iraq that kill & maim in the name of 'spreading democracy'? We are on the verge of surpassing 3,000 deaths now, not including deaths among the contractors & certainly pale by the 300,000 deaths of Iraqi civilians. All of these categories contain individual humans who had some claim to Human Rights, but they are just as dead as if they were vermin. As the Psalmist said, "How long, O Lord? How long?"

We hear about a lack of competent Arabic translators in Iraq that leads to a category of loss all its own, but if so, why did the U.S. Army see fit to fire half of its translators? Because those individuals were part of the 'discharges' for sexually deviant or incorrigible! Who took their places? People from contrators with NO competence to read the language & with the barest of street speech that was hardly skillful enough to deal with nuance. We put ourselves in that position merely because the terminated individuals were....."gay." Does how one was born inhibit Human Rights? Will Ted Haggard be addressing this in terms of his suppressed life one day soon?

People in Britain are complaining about the intrusion of CCTV cameras everywhere, but we (or in OUR name) whisk people off to Guantanamo gulag by second or third countries under the name of 'renditions.' Terror is inflicted, but it's OK in the name of 'fighting terrorism.' But who said? Only Bush's band of merrymen, who leave us all with a lot of restitution to do.

IHRD needs a notation on our calendars so that we can teach from it was Human Rights really are.

Posted by: Arden C. Hander at December 11, 2006 07:30 PM

International Human Rights Day? I'm living in Europe, which tries much harder than the US to promote a human rights image, and didn't hear a thing about it except on this website.

Posted by: john g at December 13, 2006 03:20 PM

I wish that some of the counties around here would start thinking about human rights.

The treatment of the poor and homeless is horrible in some of these counties. I'd have to ask permission to share some of the things I've learned lately- but in the name of GREED, people are being brutalized. Their civil and human rights are being trampled. And nobody cares, because, after all, they're just poor people (and according to most Americans therefore lazy and good for nothing). The counties know they're going to get away with it because the people don't have the money to fight.

And let us not forget torture and the loss of Habeas Corpus. The rape of Iraq. Need I go on?

The US doesn't lead the pack in Human Rights- at least not in reality. It falls far behind.

Only in hypocritical preaching does the US lead.

Posted by: Bob Bowers at December 14, 2006 03:42 PM

Well, I never claimed the U.S. leads the world in human rights protection. If that was ever true, it hasn't been for some time.

We did play a crucial role in the writing and adoption of the UN's Universal Declaration on Human Rights (1948), thanks to Eleanor Roosevelt who was the U.S. rep. to the drafting committee. But Lester Pierson of Canada (the only Canadian to win the Nobel Peace Prize) and others also played crucial roles. And the U.S. has been a major violator for years.

I was writing, I thought, to Christians. I want Christians to reclaim this concept and work harder to protect human rights. There is a theology that says all talk of rights is selfish--and that theology leads to impotence in the face of torture and other violations to the dignity of humans made in the image of God.

Posted by: Michael Westmoreland-White at December 14, 2006 09:07 PM

I would hope that you consider us to be Christians!

Rights being selfish? You know, I think I've heard that kind of preaching (no need to say where). It reminds me of when I asked for prayers for justice FOR us, and a fundamentalist-leaning woman told me that "Christians never ask for justice, they only do it!"

That is SICK theology!

Posted by: Bob Bowers at December 15, 2006 12:48 AM

Thanks, Bob. My comment about writing for Christians was not to cast aspersions on people in the comments section. Rather, it was because most comments centered around the question of whether or how much the U.S. government lives up to human rights standards. Well, my column criticized many governments and other powerful actors--but I wrote not to urge governments to act, but to urge Christians to renew OUR OWN commitment to human rights--including by getting involved in one or more organizations working to defend and extend human rights protections. I was expecting responses more on that kind of challenge.

Posted by: Michael Westmoreland-White at December 15, 2006 10:03 AM

Yeah. I've been fighting hard against the attitudes towards people who are homeless and/or poor. People can get involved in activities in their local area quite easily... there is certainly enough abuse of human rights to go around!

I was just thinking of a slogan we could use on this topic: Get educated- get active- get involved!

People don't understand or know the ramifications of the issues, they tend to sit back and hope someone else does the work, and you know how people are about getting involved!

The people on this SIG are generally already involved in human rights issues to one extent or another (except probably for the trolls). So, in a sense promoting these issues here is preaching to the choir.

Years ago, I heard a sermon that I liked. The priest used an anology based upon the cross- the crossbar is our relationship with others, and the vertical bar is our relationship with God. You take either away and it no longer is a cross.

Human rights issues gets to the heart of the crossbar. If someone isn't willing to grant to others the things they want for themselves, they are in effect denying the cross.

Not to mention going counter to what Teyose taught.

Posted by: Bob Bowers at December 15, 2006 03:53 PM

As far as I can tell, Bob, the "trolls" are the largest percentage of readers of these blogs. I cannot find but a handful of progressive Christians who read these pages. When I ask elsewhere in the progressive blogosphere, few have heard of CAP. (Hopefully, that will change.0 So, if I am going to contribute here, I have to write assuming that the majority of readers are NOT progressive in faith and need to be persuaded of such elementary items as persuing human rights--including, as you rightly point out, just and compassionate treatment of the poor and homeless.

Posted by: Michael Westmoreland-White at December 16, 2006 10:10 PM

Yes but look at all the gays that have been belittled and killed, and we spent billions on getting abortion outlawed you know how much you wanted us to do that. Don’t you just love us God

6: 24 "No one can serve two masters. For you will hate one and love the other, or be devoted to one and despise the other. You cannot serve both God and money
JIM WALLIS IS PREACHING ABOUT A BIBLE TORN APART. Wallis tells the crowd at the Seattle Pacific University chapel that when he was in seminary, a fellow student took hold of an old Bible and cut out "every single reference to the poor."
"And when we were done, that Bible was literally in shreds. It was falling apart in my hands. It was a Bible full of holes. I would take it out to preach and say, 'Brothers and sisters, this is our Bible

Posted by: Monte Schlarman at December 17, 2006 10:17 PM

Merry Christmas to everyone!!!

Posted by: Bob Bowers at December 25, 2006 12:15 AM

Post a comment




Remember Me?


Verification code:


Please enter your verification code:

Join the movement
Five things you can do right now to stand up, be counted and join the movement.
Donate
Sign Up for Updates